Stainless Steel in Food and Pharmaceutical Processing: Ra Surface Finish, Electropolishing, and Hygienic Design
Stainless steel is the defining construction material of every hygienic process industry — food and dairy manufacturing, brewery and beverage production, pharmaceutical synthesis, biotechnology fermentation, and semiconductor ultrapure water systems. Its selection is not arbitrary: the passive film of chromium oxide that spontaneously forms on the surface confers corrosion resistance to the aggressive alkaline, acid, and chlorinated cleaning cycles that are intrinsic to hygienic production. But the metallurgical properties of the steel alone are insufficient. Surface topography, weld quality, fitting geometry, and chemical passivation state together determine whether a piece of equipment can be reliably cleaned, sterilised, and validated to the standards demanded by regulators and process engineers. This article covers the full technical picture, from alloy selection and passive film chemistry through surface roughness measurement, electropolishing mechanisms, CIP/SIP compatibility, EHEDG and ASME BPE design requirements, and the hygienic weld qualification process.
Key Takeaways
- 316L (1.4404, PREN ≈ 25) is the minimum specification for pharmaceutical and food-contact surfaces; Mo content (2–3%) provides chloride pitting resistance that 304L (1.4307, PREN ≈ 19) cannot match in CIP environments.
- Ra ≤ 0.8 μm is the food-industry threshold below which most pathogenic bacteria cannot establish biofilm under validated CIP flow. Ra ≤ 0.5 μm (ASME BPE SF1) is the pharmaceutical standard; Ra ≤ 0.38 μm (SF4, electropolished) applies to sterile API and WFI systems.
- Electropolishing removes metal from peaks preferentially, reducing Ra by 50–80% and raising the surface Cr:Fe ratio by 1.5–2.5×, producing a more corrosion-resistant and cleaner surface than mechanical polishing alone.
- Dead legs (stub branches with L/D > 1.5) are prohibited in hygienic piping systems — stagnant zones are not reached by CIP flow and harbour persistent biofilm and product residues.
- Orbital TIG welds in hygienic tubing require silver internal colour (O₂ < 50 ppm during welding) and internal bead concavity 0–0.25 mm per ASME BPE MJ to ensure cleanability and corrosion resistance at the weld joint.
- Passivation (ASTM A967 nitric or citric acid treatment) removes free iron from fabricated surfaces and regenerates the Cr₂O₃-rich passive film; required after all machining, welding, and mechanical working operations.
Stainless Steel Grade Selection for Hygienic Applications
The selection of stainless steel grade for food and pharmaceutical process equipment is governed by corrosion resistance requirements in the specific cleaning and process chemistry, mechanical properties appropriate for the vessel or pipe design pressure, weldability without post-weld heat treatment (PWHT is impractical for large fabrications), and compliance with regulatory material lists.
316L vs 304L: The Molybdenum Difference
The most common grade decision in hygienic process design is between 304L (1.4307, 18Cr–8Ni, UNS S30403) and 316L (1.4404, 17Cr–12Ni–2.5Mo, UNS S31603). The “L” designation in both grades denotes low carbon (≤ 0.03 wt%C), which prevents sensitisation — the precipitation of chromium carbides at grain boundaries during multi-pass welding that depletes boundary Cr and creates zones susceptible to intergranular corrosion. Sensitisation is covered in detail in the welding austenitic stainless steel guide.
The decisive advantage of 316L is its molybdenum content (2–3 wt%). Molybdenum strengthens the passive film against chloride attack by two mechanisms: it increases the repassivation rate after local passive film breakdown events, and it raises the pitting potential (Epit) so that a higher chloride activity is required to nucleate a stable pit at a given temperature.
Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN): PREN = %Cr + 3.3 × %Mo + 16 × %N Grade comparison (typical compositions): 304L: 18Cr + 3.3×0 + 16×0.04 = 18.6 316L: 17Cr + 3.3×2.2 + 16×0.05 = 24.5 317L: 18Cr + 3.3×3.5 + 16×0.05 = 30.4 (higher Mo) 2205: 22Cr + 3.3×3.1 + 16×0.17 = 35.5 (duplex) Critical Pitting Temperature (ASTM G150, 1M NaCl solution): 304L: ≈15–20°C (not suitable for concentrated chlorine CIP) 316L: ≈25–35°C (adequate for validated CIP chemistry) 317L: ≈50–60°C (chloride-resistant process environments) 2205: ≈55–65°C (severe service: seawater, high Cl⁻) CIP sodium hypochlorite guideline for 316L: Max 200 ppm available Cl, pH ≥ 7, T ≤ 60°C
| Grade (EN / UNS) | Composition | PREN | Regulatory Listing | Typical Application | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 304L (1.4307 / S30403) | 18Cr–8Ni, C≤0.03% | ≈19 | EC 1935/2004; FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 | Dry food contact, mild dairy, non-CIP food equipment | No Mo: pits in chlorinated CIP. Not suitable for pharmaceutical |
| 316L (1.4404 / S31603) | 17Cr–12Ni–2.5Mo, C≤0.03% | ≈25 | EC 1935/2004; FDA 21 CFR; ASME BPE specified | Pharmaceutical (BPE), dairy, brewery, beverage, WFI systems | Risk at high T + high Cl⁻ combinations; verify CIP chemistry |
| 316 (1.4401 / S31600) | 17Cr–12Ni–2.5Mo, C≤0.08% | ≈25 | Yes | Same as 316L but avoid multi-pass welding without PWHT (sensitisation risk) | Not “L” grade; carbon risk in welding |
| 317L (1.4438 / S31703) | 18Cr–13Ni–3.5Mo, C≤0.03% | ≈30 | EC 1935/2004; FDA | High-chloride process streams; salt brines; some meat processing | Higher cost; less common in fittings/tubing range |
| 2205 Duplex (1.4462 / S32205) | 22Cr–5Ni–3Mo–0.17N | ≈35 | EC 1935/2004 | Structural vessels, high-pressure process equipment, severe Cl⁻ | Magnetic (ferrite phase); PWHT required for multi-pass welds; not all fittings available |
| 904L (1.4539 / N08904) | 20Cr–25Ni–4.5Mo–1.5Cu | ≈37 | FDA acceptable | Acetic/formic/sulfuric acid process environments; aggressive CIP with mixed acids | High cost; niche application |
Table 1 — Stainless steel grade selection for hygienic processing. PREN values are indicative; use measured compositions for critical applications. All “L” grades contain C ≤ 0.03% to prevent sensitisation during welding.
Surface Roughness: Measurement, Specification, and Biological Significance
Surface roughness quantifies the microscopic texture of a finished surface and is the primary engineering parameter governing cleanability and biofilm resistance of stainless steel hygienic equipment. In the hygienic engineering context, Ra (arithmetic mean roughness) is the universal standard specification parameter, though Rz (maximum height of profile) and Rq (root mean square roughness) are also used in specific applications.
Ra Measurement and Its Limitations
Ra is defined as the arithmetic mean of the absolute deviation of the roughness profile from the mean line, measured over a defined evaluation length (typically 4 mm or 5 sampling lengths per ISO 4288). It is measured by contact profilometry (stylus, tip radius 2 μm, per ISO 4287/ASME B46.1) or non-contact optical methods (confocal microscopy, coherence scanning interferometry per ISO 25178). The critical limitation of Ra for hygienic assessment is that it is a single-number average — two surfaces with the same Ra can have very different profiles: one with regular shallow waves, the other with deep narrow valleys. It is the valleys that harbour bacteria and resist cleaning; Ra does not distinguish them. For this reason, EHEDG and ASME BPE supplement Ra with visual examination and, for high-risk applications, profile bearing curve analysis (Abbott–Firestone curve) that quantifies valley depth distribution.
Ra Values and Their Biological Significance
ASME BPE Surface Finish Classifications (SF1–SF4)
| Class | Process | Ra Max (μm) | Ra Max (μin) | Typical Final Step | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF1 | Mechanical polish | 0.51 | 20 | 180-grit or equivalent | General pharmaceutical; API process; non-sterile biotech |
| SF2 | Mechanical polish | 0.38 | 15 | 240-grit or equivalent | Pharmaceutical; injectable solutions (non-WFI); improved cleanability |
| SF3 | Mechanical polish then electropolish | 0.51 | 20 | Electropolish (EP) from SF1 starting condition | Sterile pharmaceutical; high-purity bioprocessing |
| SF4 | Mechanical polish then electropolish | 0.38 | 15 | EP from SF2 starting condition | WFI systems; sterile API; injectable drug manufacture |
| SF5 | Mechanical polish to SF3 then EP | <0.25 | <10 | Extended EP; ultra-smooth | Semiconductor UPW; extreme purity gas distribution; not typical in pharma |
Table 2 — ASME BPE surface finish classes for product-contact surfaces in bioprocessing equipment. SF4 (mechanical + electropolished, Ra ≤ 0.38 μm) is the current standard for sterile pharmaceutical manufacturing. Ra is measured per ASME B46.1 with a 0.8 mm cut-off wavelength and 4 mm evaluation length.
Electropolishing: Mechanism, Process, and Quality Verification
Electropolishing is both a surface finishing technique and a corrosion pre-treatment. It achieves simultaneously what no mechanical process can: simultaneous reduction of surface roughness and improvement of passive film quality, without introducing mechanical work or contamination into the surface layer.
Electrochemical Mechanism
The workpiece (316L stainless steel) is immersed in an electrolyte of phosphoric acid and sulfuric acid (typically 50–70% H3PO4 + 15–40% H2SO4 + water) and made anodic (positive terminal) at a controlled current density of 3–12 A/dm² and temperature of 40–85 °C. Metal dissolution occurs at the anode surface; the key physics is the formation of a viscous, phosphate-rich mass transport boundary layer that limits dissolution. This layer is thinner over peaks (shorter diffusion path) and thicker in valleys — producing higher dissolution rate at peaks and lower in valleys. Over 5–30 minutes of treatment, peaks dissolve faster than valleys, progressively levelling the profile. Simultaneously:
- Iron dissolves faster than chromium from the surface (because Fe has a lower dissolution overpotential in the phosphoric–sulfuric acid system), increasing the Cr:Fe ratio in the residual surface layer from approximately 1.0–1.5 (mechanical) to 2.5–4.0 (electropolished), as confirmed by XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) depth profiling.
- The mechanical cold-work layer (Beilby layer) containing embedded abrasive particles and deformed grain microstructure is completely removed by the electrochemical dissolution, exposing pristine bulk microstructure.
- After electropolishing, the sample is rinsed in clean water and a thick (2–5 nm), chromium-rich Cr2O3 passive film reforms spontaneously, providing superior corrosion resistance to the mechanically polished state.
Process Control Parameters and Common Defects
Electropolishing Process Window (316L, standard H₃PO₄/H₂SO₄ electrolyte): Electrolyte composition: 60% H₃PO₄ + 25% H₂SO₄ + 15% H₂O (by volume) Bath temperature: 55–75°C (optimal levelling rate) Current density: 4–8 A/dm² (anodic) Treatment time: 5–20 min for Ra reduction Cathode material: Stainless steel 316L or lead (for electrical contact) Metal removal (typical): 10–40 μm total from each surface Ra reduction: 50–80% from mechanical starting value Minimum starting Ra: ≤1.0 μm mechanical polish to achieve SF4 Ra ≤ 0.38 μm Common defects and causes: ● Streaking / flow lines: Too low temperature or current; poor electrolyte agitation ● Pitting during EP: Too high current; crevice geometry in rack fixturing ● Orange peel texture: Coarse grain material (ASTM grain size <5); use fine-grain tube ● Inadequate Ra reduction: Insufficient treatment time; starting Ra too high (>1.5 μm) ● Passive film degradation: Insufficient post-EP rinse; chloride contamination in rinse water
Verification After Electropolishing
Quality verification of electropolished hygienic components includes:
- Surface roughness measurement: Contact profilometry per ASME B46.1 at defined sampling locations (typically minimum 3 sites including ID of tubing, elbow intrados, and weld area). Record Ra value with evaluation length and cut-off wavelength.
- Ferroxyl test (ASTM A380): Ferricyanide–nitric acid test solution turns blue in the presence of free iron on the surface. Blue spots indicate inadequate electropolishing or post-process iron contamination.
- Water break test: A clean, properly passivated surface is completely wetted by deionised water in a continuous sheet; water breaks into droplets on a contaminated or non-passive surface.
- Visual inspection: Under 60-watt fluorescent light at 25 cm distance, no visible inclusions, pits, crevices, heat tint, or mechanical damage.
- XPS depth profiling (for critical validation): Confirms Cr:Fe ratio ≥ 2.0 in the outer 2 nm of the passive film layer and absence of elemental iron at the surface.
Passivation: Chemistry, Process, and Standards
Passivation is the chemical treatment applied to stainless steel fabrications to remove free iron contamination and regenerate the chromium-rich passive oxide film. It is distinct from electropolishing — passivation does not significantly change surface roughness but restores the corrosion-protective oxide layer that fabrication, machining, and handling processes degrade.
When Passivation is Required
- After all mechanical operations: grinding, milling, turning, polishing, forming, and bending — all introduce iron-tool contamination and disrupt the passive film.
- After welding: the HAZ adjacent to welds is sensitised (for standard-carbon grades) or at minimum has a disrupted passive film. The blue-gold-brown heat tint visible on 316L welds is chromium oxide formed under oxidising conditions — it reduces the Cr content of the underlying metal and must be removed by pickling or mechanical means before passivation.
- After any surface has been in contact with carbon steel tools, fixtures, or free iron particles that could deposit and initiate corrosion cells.
- Before initial service entry of any new stainless steel equipment to establish the full passive film condition.
Passivation Procedures: ASTM A967 / AMS 2700
ASTM A967 Passivation Methods for 316L Stainless Steel:
Method 1 (Nitric Acid, low temperature):
20–25% HNO₃ by volume
21–32°C (ambient temperature)
20–30 min immersion or spray
Rinse with deionised water; dry
Method 2 (Nitric Acid, elevated temperature):
20–45% HNO₃ by volume
49–60°C
20–30 min immersion
More aggressive; preferred for cast or heavily machined surfaces
Method 6 (Citric Acid, preferred for pharmaceutical use):
4–10% citric acid by weight
21–66°C
4–60 min immersion
Environmentally preferred; no NOx emissions; FDA acceptable
Equivalent to Method 2 for 316L when properly validated
Post-treatment verification:
Water break test (visual)
Ferroxyl test (free iron detection)
High humidity exposure 24–48 hr (ASTM A967 practice F)
Salt spray 2–4 hr (aggressive acceptance test)
NOTE: Passivation alone does not remove heat tint (weld HAZ oxidation).
Heat tint must first be removed by: (a) mechanical polishing, or
(b) pickling paste (HNO₃/HF blend, ASTM A380 procedure)
before passivation treatment.
CIP and SIP: Chemistry, Design Compatibility, and Validation
Cleaning-in-place (CIP) and sterilising-in-place (SIP) are the defining operational requirements of hygienic process plants. The equipment must be designed so that cleaning and sterilisation fluids reach every product-contact surface without disassembly — and the stainless steel must withstand the temperature, chemistry, and mechanical shear of these cycles over the full equipment lifetime (typically 20–30 years, tens of thousands of CIP cycles).
Standard CIP Sequence
The CIP flow velocity through tubing must be maintained above a minimum threshold to generate sufficient wall shear stress for microbial removal. For pharmaceutical tubing per ASME BPE DT-2, the minimum recommended flow velocity is 1.5 m/s (turbulent, Re > 4,000 at 25 °C in 1.5” OD tube). Below this velocity, the cleaning solution does not generate sufficient shear to detach biofilm from the wall. CIP system design must verify that minimum velocity is achieved throughout the circuit, including at the most hydraulically remote point and through large-bore vessels and heat exchangers.
SIP Design Requirements
Steam-in-place sterilisation (pharmaceutical standard: 121 °C at 15 psig for F0 ≥ 12 min) imposes specific design requirements on the system beyond CIP:
- Thermal expansion: 316L pipe expanding from 20 °C to 121 °C over a 10 m run expands by approximately 16 mm (α = 16 × 10−6 K−1). Expansion loops or bellows are required for long runs without anchoring.
- Condensate drainage: All piping must pitch ≥ 1 % toward condensate drain points. Horizontal runs that retain condensate create cool zones not reliably sterilised by SIP and create corrosion risk from standing water.
- Steam trap location: Every low point must have a validated steam trap to remove condensate and ensure steam temperature and pressure are maintained at specification throughout the circuit.
- Temperature monitoring: Thermocouples at defined critical control points (CCPs), particularly at the most remote and coolest point in the circuit, must be validated to confirm that the required sterilisation temperature is reached and maintained for the specified F0 time.
EHEDG and ASME BPE Hygienic Design Principles
Both EHEDG (European Hygienic Engineering and Design Group) and ASME BPE articulate a set of design principles that go beyond surface finish and material selection to govern the geometry of the entire equipment assembly. These principles are the engineering translation of a single requirement: that every product-contact surface must be reachable and cleanable by the CIP/SIP system.
- Surface roughness Ra ≤ 0.8 μm (food); ≤ 0.4 μm (product-critical)
- No dead legs: stub branch L/D ≤ 1.5
- No exposed threads in product zone
- All bends: minimum radius 1.5×D; no square internal corners
- Slopes: all pipe ≥ 1% gradient toward drain; vessels ≥ 2% cone floor
- Gasket flush with internal bore: protrusion < 0.5 mm; setback < 0.5 mm
- Certification via EHEDG member organisation microbial challenge test
- No horizontal ledges where liquid can accumulate and drain improperly
- Surface finish SF1–SF4 per BPE Table SF-2
- Orbital TIG welding qualification per BPE Part MJ
- Dead leg L/D ≤ 2.0 (BPE), recommended ≤ 1.5 (user guidance)
- Tube OD dimensions: BPE DT series (differing from standard sch. pipe)
- Material certification: MTRs, PMI required for all product-contact components
- Documentation: IQ/OQ/PQ validation records; weld log books
- Electropolish documentation: pre/post Ra records; ferroxyl test record
- Clamp fitting flush bore tolerance: ±0.5 mm per BPE Part DT
Dead Leg Calculation
Dead Leg Length Limit:
L/D ≤ 2.0 (ASME BPE general requirement)
L/D ≤ 1.5 (EHEDG; most utility hygienic specifications)
L/D ≤ 1.0 (conservative pharmaceutical design best practice)
Where:
L = length of stub from main flow pipe centreline to closed end
D = nominal internal diameter of stub pipe/branch
Example: DN25 (25 mm ID) branch with L/D ≤ 1.5:
Maximum L = 1.5 × 25 = 37.5 mm
Acceptable dead leg solutions:
● Diaphragm valve body with flush diaphragm (zero dead leg)
● Orbital weld to valve body with flush bore
● Sample valve with forward-flush design
● Instrument connection with flush-diaphragm transmitter
Not acceptable:
● Threaded instrument connection (crevice + dead volume)
● Long valve inlet stub (L/D > 2 between flow and valve seat)
● Blind-flanged temporary connections left in service
Hygienic Weld Quality: Orbital TIG, Back Purge, and ASME BPE MJ
The weld joint is the most microbiologically and corrosion-risk-critical area in any hygienic stainless steel system. The heat input of welding modifies the passive film, changes the local microstructure, and can produce surface topography changes (concavity, ripple, discolouration) that reduce cleanability. ASME BPE Part MJ (Metallic Joint Requirements) establishes the minimum standard for acceptable hygienic weld quality.
Back Purge Requirements and Colour Assessment
The internal surface of any orbital TIG weld in 316L pharmaceutical tubing must be protected by a continuous flow of argon during welding to prevent oxidation of the chromium-rich passive film and the HAZ metal adjacent to the weld. The back purge argon flow rate is typically 5–15 L/min, monitored by an inline oxygen sensor. Acceptance criteria per ASME BPE and most pharmaceutical utility specifications:
Back Purge Acceptance Criteria (316L hygienic tubing):
Oxygen content of purge gas: < 50 ppm O₂ (monitoring required)
Internal weld colour assessment:
Silver / straw-silver: O₂ < 50 ppm — ACCEPT
Light straw / gold: O₂ 50–150 ppm — Review vs. specification
Gold / bronze: O₂ 150–250 ppm — REJECT (most pharma specs)
Blue: O₂ > 250 ppm — REJECT — Cr depletion confirmed
Blue-black / dark: O₂ > 500 ppm — REJECT — rework required
Why colour matters:
Blue/black tint = Cr₂O₃ layer grown under partially oxidising conditions
Cr consumed from near-surface layer → local Cr depletion
Depleted zone has reduced PREN — pitting initiation site
Rough oxidised surface traps product, CIP cannot clean reliably
All blue-tinted welds must be mechanically polished (if accessible)
or the spool rejected and re-fabricated
Internal Bead Profile Specification
ASME BPE Part MJ specifies that the internal weld bead must be:
- Concavity: 0.0–0.25 mm (measured as the maximum depth of the internal bead below the parent material ID surface level). The weld must not be recessed beyond 0.25 mm; it must not protrude above the ID surface (convexity = product-collection ledge).
- Width: Full penetration visible from both sides; no cold laps, incomplete fusion, or skip welds.
- Continuity: Continuous, uninterrupted bead around the full circumference with no start/stop overlap defects.
- Surface quality: Smooth rippled pattern (orbital weld characteristic) with no porosity, cracks, undercut, or inclusions visible under 10× magnification.
- Colour: Silver to light straw maximum per the colour scale above.
Verification methods include visual inspection under white light with mirror (direct vision on accessible joints), borescope camera inspection of internal bore, and photographic documentation archived in the weld data record book for IQ (Installation Qualification) documentation. The same orbital welding guide applies to TIG/GTAW welding metallurgy for a full technical treatment of the welding process physics.
Industry-Specific Applications and Regulatory Requirements
Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical
FDA 21 CFR Part 211 (cGMP for finished pharmaceuticals) requires product-contact surfaces to be “smooth, hard, and non-reactive.” FDA guidance documents interpret this as 316L electropolished to Ra ≤ 0.5 μm for non-sterile pharmaceutical manufacturing and Ra ≤ 0.38 μm (SF4) for sterile manufacturing including water-for-injection (WFI), clean steam, and API dissolution. The ASME BPE standard is accepted by FDA as the applicable standard for bioprocessing equipment. EU GMP Annex 1 (2022 revision for manufacture of sterile medicinal products) specifically requires that surfaces in contact with product or process support media be “smooth, electropolished where appropriate, and designed to be easily cleanable.”
Food and Dairy
EC Regulation 1935/2004 governs food contact materials in the European Union, specifying that materials must not transfer components to food in quantities that could endanger human health or impair food quality. For stainless steel, conformity is typically demonstrated by compliance with EN 1935 and the applicable national food contact positive list (e.g., Swiss Ordinance, German LFGB). The practical standard is EHEDG Document 8 (material requirements for food processing equipment), which specifies 316L or 304L depending on the chloride exposure level, Ra ≤ 0.8 μm for product-contact surfaces, and EHEDG geometric design principles. 3-A Sanitary Standards (USA) serve the equivalent function for dairy and food processing, specifying self-draining surfaces, Ra ≤ 0.8 μm, 316L for product-contact, and specific fitting geometries including 3-A approved Tri-Clamp configurations.
Semiconductor and Ultrapure Water
Ultrapure water (UPW) and process chemical distribution systems in semiconductor fabrication (fab) require the highest surface cleanliness standard — any metal ion leaching from the stainless steel tubing that contacts the UPW can cause integrated circuit defects at sub-ppb concentration levels. Electropolished 316L (SEMI F20) or electropolished Hastelloy C-22 for aggressive chemistries is used. Internal surfaces are specified to Ra ≤ 0.25 μm (10 μin) — the SF5 class beyond standard pharmaceutical requirements. Post-electropolish, surfaces are passivated with deionised water at 85 °C (hot water passivation) to form a stable oxide without chemical passivation reagent residues. Metal extractable specifications are in the ng/L (ppt) range for most metallic elements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is 316L preferred over 304L stainless steel for pharmaceutical and food processing equipment?
What Ra surface finish is required for pharmaceutical tubing per ASME BPE?
What is electropolishing and how does it improve hygienic performance?
What is passivation of stainless steel and when is it required?
What is the EHEDG standard and how does it differ from ASME BPE?
What weld quality requirements apply to hygienic stainless steel piping?
What is a dead leg and why is it prohibited in hygienic piping design?
What chloride concentration causes pitting in 316L stainless steel in CIP systems?
How are hygienic fittings joined without creating crevice corrosion?
Recommended References
Disclosure: MetallurgyZone participates in the Amazon Associates programme. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support free technical content on this site.
Further Reading
