Microalloyed Bar and Forging Steels: As-Rolled and Controlled Cooling Properties
Microalloyed steels — low-to-medium carbon steels containing small additions of niobium, vanadium, and titanium — represent one of the most economically important innovations in modern steel metallurgy. By exploiting grain refinement, precipitation strengthening, and thermomechanical processing, microalloyed steels achieve yield strengths of 350–900 MPa in the as-rolled or as-forged condition, eliminating the quench-and-temper heat treatment cycle that would otherwise be required. In the automotive industry alone, microalloyed V-N forging steels such as 38MnVS6 have displaced Q&T steels for crankshafts, connecting rods, and axle shafts — generating savings of €30–80 per component from eliminated heat treatment while simultaneously improving machinability. This article provides a graduate-level treatment of the microalloying mechanisms, thermomechanical processing strategies, interphase precipitation theory, controlled cooling technology, and automotive production case studies.
Key Takeaways
- Microalloying elements (Nb, V, Ti) at 0.01–0.15 wt% produce three strengthening effects: grain refinement (Hall-Petch), precipitation strengthening (Orowan bypass), and recrystallisation retardation during hot working.
- Vanadium primarily strengthens through interphase precipitation of VC/VN during the austenite-to-ferrite transformation; particle size is 3–10 nm, giving 100–200 MPa yield strength increment per 0.1% V.
- Nitrogen alloying to 100–200 ppm in V steels raises precipitation temperature, increases VN fraction, and adds 15–30 MPa per 50 ppm N at very low cost — a highly efficient strengthening strategy.
- Niobium is the most potent element for raising Tnr (non-recrystallisation temperature) and enabling thermomechanical controlled processing (TMCP) to produce fine ferrite grain sizes after rolling.
- Controlled cooling from forging temperature at 0.1–1°C/s through 800–650°C maximises interphase precipitation yield in V-N forging grades, eliminating Q&T heat treatment.
- Carbon equivalent (CEIIW) of microalloyed HSLA bar steels is typically <0.43 at 355 MPa grade and <0.47 at 460 MPa grade, ensuring good weldability without preheat for most structural applications.
Microalloyed Steel Yield Strength Estimator
Estimates ferrite-pearlite yield strength contributions from Hall-Petch grain refinement, precipitation, and solid solution strengthening
The Four Strengthening Mechanisms in Microalloyed Steels
The yield strength of a ferrite-pearlite microalloyed steel is the sum of four additive contributions, each arising from a different physical mechanism:
σₑ = σ₀ + ΔσSS + ΔσHP + Δσprecip where: σ₀ = Peierls-Nabarro friction stress for ferrite ≈ 70 MPa ΔσSS = Solid solution strengthening (Mn, Si, N in solution) ΔσHP = Hall-Petch grain refinement: kₑ × d⁻½ (kₑ ≈ 18 MPa·μm½ for ferrite) Δσprecip = Orowan bypass precipitation strengthening (from VC, VN, NbC, TiC) Solid solution contributions (Pickering-Gladman, MPa per wt%): Mn: +33 MPa/% Si: +83 MPa/% Mo: +11 MPa/% N in solution: +35 MPa/100 ppm (but N rapidly consumed by VN, TiN) Hall-Petch relationship: ΔσHP = kₑ × d⁻½ = 18 × d⁻½ (d in μm, σ in MPa) d = 10 μm: ΔσHP = 18 × (10)⁻½ = 18/3.162 = 56.9 MPa d = 5 μm: ΔσHP = 18 × (5)⁻½ = 18/2.236 = 80.5 MPa Orowan precipitation strengthening (Ashby-Orowan): Δσprecip = 0.538 × Gσ × b × f½ / r × ln(r/b) Gσ(ferrite) = 80 GPa, b = 0.248 nm For f = 0.003 (volume fraction), r = 3 nm: Δσ ≈ 200 MPa
Why Precipitation Strengthening Is Dominant in Microalloyed Forging Steels
In HSLA structural steels (S355, S460), grain refinement contributes the largest fraction of yield strength above the ferrite baseline. In microalloyed forging steels (38MnVS6, 36MnVS4), which have higher carbon and manganese content, the ferrite grain size is coarser (pearlite fraction is higher) and the Hall-Petch contribution is lower. Instead, interphase precipitation from vanadium and nitrogen provides the dominant strengthening increment. This is why V-N microalloying is specifically optimised for forging steels, while Nb-Ti combinations are more effective in flat-rolled HSLA products where thermomechanical rolling is possible.
Vanadium and Nitrogen: Interphase Precipitation in Detail
The interphase precipitation mechanism was first described by Honeycombe (1976) for vanadium steels and has since been extensively characterised by atom probe tomography and TEM for both V-C and V-N systems. The process:
- As cooling brings the steel below Ac3, austenite begins to transform to ferrite at grain boundaries and on prior austenite grain surfaces.
- The advancing austenite-ferrite interface rejects vanadium (which partitions strongly to the V-rich austenite side of the interface) and supersaturates it at the interface.
- When the local supersaturation reaches the nucleation threshold for VC or VN, a planar row of particles nucleates on the interface plane.
- The interface then migrates forward into the austenite (as more ferrite forms), until the next nucleation event deposits another row of particles at the new interface position.
- The result is alternating ferrite (clean) bands and particle rows at spacings of 10–50 nm, producing the characteristic banded microstructure observed in TEM.
The effectiveness of interphase precipitation depends critically on:
- Nitrogen content: VN nucleates at higher temperatures than VC (≈30–50°C difference), so higher N content extends the precipitation temperature range and increases the precipitate volume fraction. Each 50 ppm increase in N adds ~15–30 MPa yield strength at constant V content, making nitrogen the cheapest available strengthening agent in V-N steels.
- Cooling rate through the transformation range: Too fast (>3°C/s) — insufficient time for V diffusion to the interface, low precipitate volume fraction. Too slow (<0.05°C/s) — coarsening of particles occurs before transformation is complete, reducing strengthening per unit volume. Optimal: 0.1–1°C/s, achievable in controlled cooling systems on forging lines.
- Prior austenite carbon content: Higher C raises the VN solubility in austenite, leaving more V available for precipitation. This is one reason medium-carbon V-N forging steels (0.35–0.45% C) respond better to V-N microalloying than low-carbon HSLA grades (0.06–0.12% C) on a per-unit-V basis.
Niobium: Grain Refinement and Thermomechanical Processing
Niobium's primary role in microalloyed steels is to raise the non-recrystallisation temperature Tnr and enable thermomechanical controlled processing (TMCP). The mechanism is dual:
Solute Drag on Austenite Grain Boundaries
Niobium atoms in solid solution in austenite segregate to grain boundaries and significantly reduce boundary mobility through solute drag. This effect suppresses recrystallisation kinetics below about 950–1050°C for typical Nb contents of 0.03–0.06%. Rolling below Tnr accumulates deformation in the unrecrystallised austenite — producing a heavily pancaked grain shape with a greatly increased density of potential ferrite nucleation sites (deformation bands, shear bands).
Zener Pinning by NbC/Nb(C,N) Precipitates
As temperature falls below ~1100°C during rolling, fine NbC precipitates form in the austenite and provide Zener pinning of grain boundaries and subgrain boundaries. This simultaneously retards both grain growth and recrystallisation, complementing the solute drag mechanism. The Zener pinning condition is:
d𝔞ᵍᵖᵓ = (4rₚ) / (3f) [Zener limit for grain growth] where rₚ = particle radius, f = particle volume fraction For NbC with rₚ = 10 nm, f = 0.001 (0.05% Nb): d𝔞ᵍᵖᵓ = (4 × 10) / (3 × 0.001) = 13,333 nm = 13.3 μm → prevents grain growth above this size After TMCP finishing below T𝓃ᵣ, transformation gives ferrite grain size 5–8 μm (much finer than the Zener-limited austenite grain size of ~13 μm, because ferrite nucleates on all deformation band surfaces within the pancaked austenite)
The Boratto Equation for Tnr
T𝓃ᵣ (°C) = 887 + 464×C + (6445×Nb − 644×√Nb) + (732×V − 230×√V) + 890×Ti + 363×Al − 357×Si Example: 0.10C, 0.04Nb, 0.08V, 0.015Ti, 0.04Al, 0.30Si: T𝓃ᵣ = 887 + 46.4 + (257.8 − 128.8) + (58.6 − 65.1) + 13.4 + 14.5 − 107.1 T𝓃ᵣ ≈ 977°C Finishing rolls must be below 977°C to accumulate unrecrystallised austenite deformation and enable fine ferrite grain production on the runout table.
Titanium: High-Temperature Grain Pinning and Sulphide Shape Control
Titanium forms TiN at very high temperatures — above 1400°C for concentrations above ~0.015% Ti, meaning TiN particles are stable throughout the entire hot rolling schedule including reheating, and also survive the heat-affected zone thermal cycle of welding up to the HAZ peak temperature. This makes Ti the element of choice for:
- Preventing austenite grain coarsening during slab reheating: Fine TiN particles (30–100 nm) at 0.01–0.02% Ti pin austenite grain boundaries at reheating temperatures of 1,100–1,250°C, maintaining a fine starting austenite grain size before rolling begins.
- HAZ grain pinning in welding: TiN particles remaining in the HAZ of structural steel welds prevent grain coarsening in the coarse-grained HAZ (CGHAZ) adjacent to the weld fusion line, maintaining toughness. This is the specific motivation for Ti addition in offshore structural steels (S355G10+M, S420G1+M) and pipeline steels (API 5L X65, X70).
- Sulphide shape control: At Ti/S ratios above approximately 3.4, titanium reacts preferentially with sulphur to form cubic TiS or Ti4C2S2 particles rather than the elongated MnS stringers that form in standard steels. This eliminates the harmful through-thickness anisotropy of toughness (and susceptibility to lamellar tearing) caused by elongated MnS stringers in rolled plate.
Microalloyed Bar Steel Grades: Composition and Properties
Microalloyed bar steels for structural and engineering applications span a wide range from S355 grade (HSLA flat bar) to S690 (high-strength quenched and tempered reference grade). The grades below represent the as-rolled or normalised-rolled (not Q&T) achievable strength range through microalloying plus thermomechanical rolling.
| Grade / Standard | C (max, %) | Mn (%) | Nb (%) | V (%) | Ti (%) | CEIIW | YS (MPa) | UTS (MPa) | CVN −40°C (J) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S355J2 / EN 10025-2 | 0.20 | 1.60 | 0–0.05 | 0–0.10 | 0–0.03 | ≤0.43 | 355 | 470–630 | 27 |
| S420ML / EN 10025-4 | 0.12 | 1.60 | 0.02–0.05 | 0–0.10 | 0.015–0.025 | ≤0.39 | 420 | 520–680 | 40 |
| S460NL / EN 10025-3 | 0.16 | 1.65 | 0.02–0.06 | 0.02–0.10 | 0–0.03 | ≤0.46 | 460 | 550–720 | 27 |
| S500MC / EN 10149-2 | 0.12 | 1.80 | 0.02–0.06 | 0.02–0.10 | 0.02–0.15 | ≤0.47 | 500 | 550–700 | 27 |
| HSLA 550 (Nb-V-Ti-N) | 0.10 | 1.80 | 0.04–0.06 | 0.06–0.10 | 0.02–0.04 | ≤0.45 | 550 | 600–750 | 60 |
| S620QL / EN 10137 (Q&T ref.) | 0.18 | 1.50 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.02 | ≤0.55 | 620 | 700–890 | 40 |
| S420ML and S460NL are thermomechanically rolled (M = TMCP, L = low temp toughness). CEIIW = C + Mn/6 + (Cr+Mo+V)/5 + (Ni+Cu)/15. CVN values at −40°C for L-grade (low temperature toughness requirement). Data from EN 10025-2/3/4, EN 10149-2. | |||||||||
Microalloyed Forging Steels: Automotive Grades
Microalloyed forging steels for automotive powertrain applications require higher carbon than structural HSLA grades (to achieve the 800–1,000 MPa strength required for crankshafts and connecting rods) but rely on the same V-N interphase precipitation mechanism in combination with pearlite strengthening from the higher carbon content.
| Grade | Standard | C (%) | Mn (%) | V (%) | N (ppm) | YS (MPa) | UTS (MPa) | Hardness (HB) | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38MnVS6 | EN 10267 | 0.34–0.41 | 1.20–1.60 | 0.10–0.20 | 100–200 | ≥560 | 800–1000 | 230–290 | Crankshafts, steering knuckles |
| 36MnVS4 | EN 10267 | 0.33–0.40 | 0.90–1.30 | 0.08–0.15 | 100–200 | ≥490 | 700–900 | 200–265 | Connecting rods (fracture-split) |
| 46MnVS3 | EN 10267 | 0.42–0.50 | 0.70–1.10 | 0.06–0.12 | 80–150 | ≥500 | 750–950 | 215–275 | Connecting rods, front axles |
| 30MnVS6 | EN 10267 | 0.26–0.33 | 1.20–1.60 | 0.10–0.18 | 120–200 | ≥490 | 700–900 | 200–260 | Axle beams, wheel hubs |
| S38CV (AISI equiv.) | SAE J775 | 0.35–0.42 | 0.80–1.20 | 0.08–0.15 | 80–150 | ≥550 | 800–950 | 235–285 | North American crankshaft spec. |
| All grades are supplied in the as-forged + controlled-cooled condition (no Q&T). Nitrogen values are targets including FeMnN addition to ladle. EN 10267 specifies chemistry and mechanical properties for as-forged microalloyed steels. Minimum YS values are for 100 mm test bar. | |||||||||
Carbon Equivalent and Weldability
For structural HSLA bar steels, weldability is a primary design constraint. The carbon equivalent (CE) is the most widely used index for predicting susceptibility to hydrogen-induced cold cracking (HAC) in the weld heat-affected zone. Two formulas are in common use:
IIW Carbon Equivalent (CE𝐼𝐼𝑊): CE = C + Mn/6 + (Cr + Mo + V)/5 + (Ni + Cu)/15 Valid for C > 0.18% (general structural steels) Preheat not required: CE ≤ 0.42 (thin sections, low restraint) Preheat recommended: CE = 0.42–0.60 Preheat mandatory: CE > 0.60 Pcm (Ito-Bessyo) Carbon Equivalent: Pcm = C + Si/30 + (Mn + Cu + Cr)/20 + Ni/60 + Mo/15 + V/10 + 5B Valid for C < 0.18% (low-carbon HSLA steels) Better predictor for modern clean HSLA steels Example: S460NL (0.16C, 1.60Mn, 0.05Nb, 0.08V, 0.025Ti, 0.04Al): CE𝐼𝐼𝑊 = 0.16 + 1.60/6 + (0 + 0 + 0.08)/5 = 0.16 + 0.267 + 0.016 = 0.443 → Preheat required above 25 mm thickness and high restraint Example: 38MnVS6 forging steel (0.38C, 1.40Mn, 0.14V): CE𝐼𝐼𝑊 = 0.38 + 1.40/6 + 0.14/5 = 0.38 + 0.233 + 0.028 = 0.641 → Not intended for welding in service; mechanical assembly only
The low-carbon HSLA bar grades (S355–S500, 0.06–0.16% C) are typically weldable without preheat in sections up to 20–30 mm thickness under the relevant EN 1011-2 procedure. The higher-carbon microalloyed forging grades (38MnVS6, 0.38% C) are not designed for welding and are typically used in mechanical assemblies where welds are not present in the hardened zones. See the hydrogen-induced cracking guide for detailed HAZ microstructure and cold cracking mechanism discussion.
Controlled Cooling Technology on Forging Lines
Achieving the optimal cooling rate of 0.1–1°C/s through the transformation range (850–650°C) requires purpose-designed cooling equipment installed at the exit of the forging press or trimming station. Three systems are commonly used:
Forced Air Convection
High-volume air blowers (typically 2,000–10,000 m³/h per zone) direct ambient air onto the hot forging through stainless steel nozzle arrays. Cooling rates of 0.3–1.5°C/s are achievable depending on forging section size, initial temperature, and air volume. Forced air gives the most uniform and controllable cooling rate and is preferred for complex-geometry forgings (crankshafts, steering knuckles) where differential section sizes require spatially variable cooling. The main limitation is that very large sections (>100 mm diameter) cool too slowly even with maximum air volume to achieve the transformation range within the specified rate.
Water-Air Fog Spray
Atomised water mist mixed with compressed air gives higher heat extraction rates (1–5°C/s) than forced air alone, without the severity or distortion risk of direct water spray. The water fraction is adjustable by varying the water/air ratio, allowing fine control of the cooling rate. This system is used for large-section forgings (>80 mm diameter) where forced air gives insufficient cooling rate, and for grades requiring bainite rather than ferrite-pearlite microstructure (which requires faster cooling through the transformation range).
Rotating Conveyor with Controlled Atmosphere
Hot forgings are placed on a rotating conveyor that passes through a temperature-controlled tunnel, providing uniform natural convection cooling at rates between still air and forced air (0.05–0.3°C/s). Used for small forgings where variability in air cooling of static parts on a pallet would produce unacceptable property scatter.
Fracture-Split Connecting Rods: A V-N Microalloying Success Story
The fracture-split (cracked) connecting rod is one of the most commercially significant applications of V-N microalloyed forging steels, and illustrates the close coupling between material properties and manufacturing process design. A conventional connecting rod requires the big end to be machined to a split surface, the cap separated, and the mating faces ground flat before reassembly. A fracture-split connecting rod instead uses a high-energy brittle fracture through the big end to separate the cap — the crack follows the microstructure of the steel, producing a perfectly matched fracture surface that eliminates machining of the mating faces entirely, reducing manufacturing cost by approximately €2–4 per unit.
The microstructure requirements for a good fracture split are stringent:
- Brittle fracture mode: The fracture must be cleavage-dominated (brittle) at the notch tip, propagating rapidly across the big-end bore. This requires a ferritic-pearlitic microstructure with sufficient nitrogen to ensure a high DBTT — the connecting rod is typically cooled to −40 to −60°C in liquid nitrogen before fracture to ensure it is on the lower shelf of the Charpy transition curve.
- Uniform hardness: Hardness variation around the big-end bore must be <±15 HB to prevent crack deviation from the desired plane. This requires very uniform V-N precipitation, achievable only with controlled cooling within ±20°C of the target temperature profile.
- Controlled nitrogen: 100–150 ppm N is the target. Too low — insufficient brittleness for clean fracture split. Too high — strain ageing embrittlement in service after reconditioning (re-assembly with new bolts generates plastic strain).
- Steel grade: 36MnVS4 and 46MnVS3 are the dominant grades. Their medium carbon content gives the right balance of hardness (200–260 HB) and brittleness for fracture splitting while retaining adequate fatigue strength in service.
Quality Control and Inspection
Microalloyed bar and forging steels are inspected against a combination of chemical, dimensional, and mechanical property requirements.
- Composition verification: Optical emission spectrometry (OES) on ladle samples and product samples. PMI (positive material identification) by XRF for V and Nb. Nitrogen measurement by LECO combustion analysis is mandatory for V-N forging grades where N is a process-critical element.
- Mechanical testing: Tensile test (YS, UTS, elongation) on longitudinal round bar specimens per EN ISO 6892-1. Charpy V-notch impact testing at the specified temperature per EN ISO 148-1. Hardness testing (Brinell HB or Vickers HV30) at multiple locations around the bar cross-section to verify uniformity — hardness scatter indicates non-uniform cooling in controlled cooling systems. See the hardness testing guide for method selection and conversion between scales.
- Microstructural assessment: Nital etch (2% HNO₃ in ethanol) to reveal grain boundaries, pearlite fraction, and banding severity. ASTM E112 grain size determination. Banding index (ratio of elongated pearlite band spacing to bar diameter) is specified for some automotive grades to limit anisotropy.
- Standards: EN 10267 (microalloyed forging steels); EN 10025-2/3/4 (structural hot-rolled sections and bars); ASTM A572 (HSLA bar, North America); SAE J775 (automotive forging steels). All require mill test certificates (EN 10204 3.1 or 3.2) with certified composition and mechanical properties.
Comparison with Quench-and-Temper Steels at the Same Strength Level
| Property / Feature | 38MnVS6 (microalloyed, as-forged + controlled cool) | 42CrMo4 (Q&T at same YS ~800 MPa) |
|---|---|---|
| Process route | Forge → controlled cool → no PWHT | Forge → austenitise → quench → temper → straighten |
| YS (MPa) | 560–780 | 650–900 (temper temperature dependent) |
| UTS (MPa) | 800–1000 | 900–1100 |
| Fatigue strength (MPa, R=−1) | ≈480–520 | ≈500–550 |
| Impact CVN at −20°C (J) | ≈20–40 (lower toughness) | ≈40–80 (higher toughness) |
| Machinability | Excellent (ferrite-pearlite chips well) | Moderate (tempered martensite is harder to machine) |
| Distortion after processing | Minimal (no quench) | Requires straightening after quench |
| Processing cost (relative) | Baseline | +€30–80/tonne for Q&T |
| CEIIW | 0.55–0.65 | 0.70–0.85 (less weldable) |
| Applicable standards | EN 10267 | EN 10083-3 |
| The toughness disadvantage of microalloyed as-forged steel is acceptable for crankshafts and connecting rods where impact is not the primary failure mode. The combination of cost saving, better machinability, and no distortion makes 38MnVS6 the preferred specification for high-volume automotive crankshaft production worldwide. | ||
Frequently Asked Questions
What is microalloying in steel and which elements are used?
What is interphase precipitation and why is it important in vanadium steels?
What is the role of nitrogen in vanadium microalloyed steels?
Why is niobium more effective than vanadium for grain refinement?
What is controlled cooling from forging temperature?
How does the carbon equivalent affect the weldability of microalloyed bar steels?
What are the typical applications of V-N microalloyed forging steels in automotive manufacturing?
What is the Orowan bypass mechanism for precipitation strengthening?
How is the austenite non-recrystallisation temperature T_nr used in hot rolling of microalloyed steels?
Key References
- Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H. and Honeycombe, R., Steels: Microstructure and Properties, 4th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017. (Chapter 12: Microalloyed Steels)
- Gladman, T., The Physical Metallurgy of Microalloyed Steels. Institute of Materials, 1997.
- Pickering, F.B., Physical Metallurgy and the Design of Steels. Applied Science, 1978.
- Honeycombe, R.W.K. (1976). Transformation from austenite in alloy steels. Metallurgical Transactions A, 7(7), pp.915–936.
- EN 10267:2014 — Steels for quenched and tempered springs / microalloyed steels for hot-formed forgings.
- EN 10025-3/4:2019 — Hot rolled products of structural steels, thermomechanically rolled.
- ASM Handbook Vol. 1: Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys. ASM International, 2005.
Recommended Technical References
The Physical Metallurgy of Microalloyed Steels — Gladman
The definitive specialist text on Nb, V, and Ti microalloying mechanisms — grain refinement, precipitation theory, thermomechanical processing, and industrial practice.
View on AmazonSteels: Microstructure and Properties — Bhadeshia & Honeycombe (4th Ed.)
Graduate-level treatment of strengthening mechanisms, precipitation strengthening theory, HSLA steels, and forging steel metallurgy.
View on AmazonSteels: Processing, Structure & Performance — Krauss (2nd Ed.)
Comprehensive industrial perspective on all steel families including HSLA grades, microalloyed forging steels, and automotive applications.
View on AmazonASM Handbook Vol. 14A — Metalworking: Bulk Forming
Covers forging process design, controlled cooling systems on forging lines, microalloyed forging steel process specifications, and automotive case studies.
View on AmazonDisclosure: MetallurgyZone participates in the Amazon Associates programme. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support free technical content on this site.
Further Reading & Related Topics
Iron-Carbon Phase Diagram
Thermodynamic basis for austenite stability, Ac3 temperature, and ferrite-pearlite transformation in microalloyed steels.
Grain Boundaries
Grain boundary energy, Zener pinning by precipitates, and Hall-Petch strengthening — the physical basis of grain refinement in HSLA steels.
Martensite Formation
Ms temperature calculation, hardenability, and comparison of martensite versus ferrite-pearlite strengthening strategies.
Bainite Microstructure
Bainitic microalloyed steels: faster controlled cooling from forging temperature produces bainite rather than ferrite-pearlite for higher strength.
Hydrogen Induced Cracking
Carbon equivalent, preheat requirements, and HAZ microstructure control for weldable HSLA bar steel grades.
Hardness Testing Methods
Brinell, Vickers, and Rockwell testing for microalloyed bar and forging quality control; hardness-to-yield-strength conversion.
HAZ Microstructure
How TiN particles in HSLA steels pin HAZ grains during welding, maintaining toughness in the coarse-grained HAZ.
Charpy Impact Test
Low-temperature toughness testing for HSLA bar grades and the role of grain refinement in improving Charpy transition temperature.