Thermal Fatigue in Metals and Components
Thermal fatigue produces cracking from cyclic stresses generated purely by repeated temperature change, without any directly applied mechanical load, making it a distinct but closely related problem to conventional mechanical fatigue. This guide covers the thermal stress mechanism, why thermal fatigue behaves as low-cycle fatigue, the Coffin-Manson life prediction approach, creep-fatigue interaction at high temperature, material selection, testing methods, and design strategies to reduce risk.
Key Takeaways
- Thermal fatigue stress arises from constrained thermal expansion/contraction or from internal thermal gradients, not from an externally applied mechanical load.
- Fully constrained uniaxial thermal stress follows σ = EαΔT; because induced strain scales directly with ΔT, thermal cycling usually falls in the low-cycle, plastic-strain-dominated fatigue regime.
- The Coffin-Manson relation, Δεp/2 = εf′(2Nf)c, is the standard life prediction tool for this regime, with c typically between -0.5 and -0.7.
- When high-temperature hold periods accompany thermal cycling, creep-fatigue interaction can shorten life well below what fatigue cycling alone would predict.
- Low thermal expansion, high thermal conductivity, and good high-temperature ductility all improve thermal fatigue resistance.
- Thermal shock (a single severe event) and thermal fatigue (cumulative cyclic damage) are related but distinct failure modes requiring different design consideration.
What Is Thermal Fatigue?
Thermal fatigue is the accumulation of fatigue damage, ultimately leading to crack initiation and growth, from repeated cycles of thermally induced stress rather than from a directly applied cyclic mechanical load. The stress itself is entirely a byproduct of the material’s tendency to expand when heated and contract when cooled, combined with some form of restraint preventing that dimensional change from occurring freely.
Two Origins of Thermal Stress
Thermal stress arises through two related but distinct mechanisms. External constraint occurs when a component is rigidly attached to, or forms part of, a larger structure that prevents free thermal expansion or contraction — a pipe fixed at both ends, a component clamped in an assembly, or a coating bonded to a substrate with a different coefficient of thermal expansion. Internal constraint, or self-constraint, occurs even in an entirely unrestrained, free-standing component whenever a temperature gradient exists within it: a hot surface attempting to expand is restrained by a cooler interior that has not yet expanded to the same degree, and vice versa on cooling, generating internal stress purely from the mismatch in local thermal strain across the part.
Thermal Stress: The E-α-ΔT Relationship
For a fully constrained uniaxial case — a bar or plate whose ends are rigidly prevented from moving as temperature changes — the induced elastic thermal stress follows directly from the material’s stiffness, expansion coefficient, and the temperature change.
Uniaxial constraint: σ = E α ΔT Biaxial/equal constraint (e.g. thin disc, plate): σ = E α ΔT / (1 - ν) where: E = elastic modulus (temperature-dependent) α = coefficient of thermal expansion (temperature-dependent) ΔT = temperature change ν = Poisson's ratio
Because real materials have finite yield strength, this elastic estimate is frequently exceeded in practice: once the calculated elastic thermal stress surpasses the material’s yield strength at the relevant temperature, the material yields locally, and the actual response becomes strain-controlled rather than stress-controlled — the induced thermal strain is largely fixed by the geometry and ΔT, but the resulting stress is capped near the material’s flow stress, with the excess accommodated by plastic deformation. This shift from stress control to strain control is precisely why thermal fatigue is normally analysed using low-cycle, strain-based fatigue methods rather than the stress-based (S-N) approach used for high-cycle mechanical fatigue.
Thermal Fatigue as Low-Cycle Fatigue
Because thermally induced strain scales directly with αΔT rather than with an externally controlled applied load, even a modest temperature swing on a material with a typical metallic coefficient of thermal expansion can readily exceed the elastic strain range corresponding to yield, placing thermal fatigue squarely in the low-cycle, plastic-strain-dominated fatigue regime rather than the elastic, high-cycle regime addressed by conventional S-N curve analysis.
The Coffin-Manson Relation
Δεp / 2 = εf′ (2Nf)c
where:
Δεp = plastic strain range per cycle
Nf = cycles to failure
εf′ = fatigue ductility coefficient
(approximated by true fracture ductility, εf)
c = fatigue ductility exponent, typically -0.5 to -0.7
for most metals (steeper/more negative under
creep or environmental interaction)
Total Strain-Life: Combining Elastic and Plastic Contributions
At the strain ranges typical of thermal cycling, both elastic (Basquin) and plastic (Coffin-Manson) strain components contribute meaningfully to total life, and the two are commonly combined into a single total strain-life relationship, the basis of most modern low-cycle and thermo-mechanical fatigue life prediction methods.
Δε / 2 = (σf′ / E)(2Nf)b + εf′(2Nf)c where: σf′ = fatigue strength coefficient b = fatigue strength exponent, typically -0.05 to -0.12 At short life (high strain range), the plastic (Coffin-Manson) term dominates; at long life (low strain range), the elastic (Basquin) term dominates.
Temperature-Dependent Constants
For genuine thermo-mechanical fatigue (TMF), where temperature varies simultaneously with strain through the cycle, E, α, σf′, εf′, b, and c are all themselves temperature-dependent, and the isothermal constants used above become temperature-dependent functions, b(T) and c(T), evaluated at the relevant point in the cycle. TMF life prediction is consequently more involved than isothermal LCF prediction and often relies on finite element-based stress-strain-temperature history combined with a dedicated TMF life model rather than a single closed-form equation.
Thermal Shock vs Thermal Fatigue vs Thermo-Mechanical Fatigue
| Term | Definition | Typical Failure Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal shock | A single, severe, rapid temperature change event | Immediate cracking or fracture from one event |
| Thermal fatigue | Cumulative damage from many repeated temperature cycles | Crack initiation and growth over many cycles |
| Thermo-mechanical fatigue (TMF) | Simultaneous, often out-of-phase, cyclic mechanical strain and temperature | Combined fatigue, oxidation, and sometimes creep damage per cycle |
Creep-Fatigue Interaction
Components thermally cycled at high homologous temperature, particularly those with sustained hold periods at peak temperature (start-stop power plant operation is the classic example), accumulate creep damage during the hold in addition to conventional fatigue damage from the cycling itself. Because these two damage mechanisms interact rather than simply adding independently, components subject to creep-fatigue typically show shorter life than either pure fatigue cycling or pure sustained creep loading would predict in isolation.
Σ (ni / Nfi) + Σ (tj / trj) ≤ D
where:
ni/Nfi = fatigue damage fraction for each cycle type
tj/trj = creep damage fraction for each hold period
(trj = creep rupture time at hold stress/temperature)
D = allowable combined damage fraction (often < 1,
with margin, per governing design code)
This time-fraction approach underlies creep-fatigue design rules in codes such as ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Subsection NH, used for high-temperature nuclear and power plant components, and is a central design consideration for creep-resistant Cr-Mo and 9-12%Cr steels such as P91/P92, where the fine-grained HAZ is particularly susceptible to combined creep-fatigue damage during repeated plant startup and shutdown cycling.
Material Factors Governing Thermal Fatigue Resistance
| Property | Effect on Thermal Fatigue Resistance |
|---|---|
| Coefficient of thermal expansion (α) | Lower α directly reduces induced thermal strain for a given ΔT |
| Thermal conductivity (k) | Higher k reduces internal temperature gradients, lowering self-constrained thermal stress |
| Elastic modulus (E) | Lower E reduces stress for a given elastic strain, though usually a secondary lever versus α and k |
| Yield strength and ductility at temperature | Higher ductility allows more plastic strain accommodation before cracking; adequate high-temperature strength limits excessive plastic strain per cycle |
| Oxidation/corrosion resistance at temperature | Surface oxidation can accelerate crack initiation under cyclic thermal exposure, especially in TMF |
| Microstructural stability | Resistance to overaging, carbide coarsening, or phase changes during repeated thermal cycling preserves strength and ductility over service life |
Common Applications and Failure Examples
- Gas turbine blades and discs: severe TMF from startup/shutdown cycling combined with steady-state centrifugal and gas-bending loads.
- Exhaust manifolds and turbocharger housings: repeated heating/cooling with engine cycling, often complicated by dissimilar-material joints and constrained mounting.
- Brake rotors and discs: rapid, localized surface heating during braking events followed by cooling, producing surface-initiated thermal fatigue cracking (heat checking).
- Die-casting and forging dies: repeated contact with molten or hot metal followed by cooling/ejection, a classic thermal fatigue (heat checking) application.
- Boiler tubes and heat exchangers: startup/shutdown cycling and load-following operation in power generation, often coupled with creep-fatigue interaction.
- Weld repairs and dissimilar-metal joints: mismatched coefficients of thermal expansion across a joint amplify thermal stress under cyclic service temperature.
Testing Methods
How Thermal Fatigue Is Evaluated
- Constrained specimen thermal cycling: a specimen with defined mechanical constraint is cycled through a temperature range while stress or strain response is monitored, directly reproducing the constrained-expansion mechanism.
- Isothermal low-cycle fatigue testing: conventional strain-controlled LCF testing at a fixed elevated temperature, used to generate the Coffin-Manson constants applied in subsequent life prediction.
- Thermo-mechanical fatigue (TMF) testing: synchronized heating (often induction) and mechanical straining reproduce in-phase or out-of-phase thermal-mechanical cycles representative of actual service.
- Thermal shock cycling: repeated rapid heating and quenching cycles assess resistance to surface heat-checking cracks, common for die and mold material qualification.
- Finite element-based life prediction: stress-strain-temperature history from a coupled thermal-structural FE model is post-processed with a TMF life model to predict cycles to crack initiation at critical locations.
Design Mitigation Strategies
- Minimize sharp geometric discontinuities (fillets, notches, section changes) that locally concentrate thermally induced strain.
- Provide flexibility, expansion joints, or sliding supports to relieve external mechanical constraint on thermally cycled components where the design allows.
- Reduce internal thermal gradients through more uniform heating/cooling, improved cooling passage design, or reduced heating/cooling rates where process requirements permit.
- Select materials with lower thermal expansion, higher thermal conductivity, and adequate high-temperature ductility for the specific service cycle.
- For creep-fatigue-prone applications, minimize unnecessary hold time at peak temperature and consider combined damage assessment per the governing design code rather than fatigue analysis alone.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is thermal fatigue?
What causes thermal stress in a cyclically heated component?
Why is thermal fatigue usually analysed as low-cycle fatigue?
What is the Coffin-Manson relation?
What is creep-fatigue interaction?
What is the difference between thermal shock and thermal fatigue?
What material properties improve thermal fatigue resistance?
What is thermo-mechanical fatigue (TMF)?
Which components commonly fail from thermal fatigue?
How can thermal fatigue be reduced through design?
Recommended Reference Books
Mechanical Behavior of Materials by Norman E. Dowling
Comprehensive treatment of low-cycle fatigue, Coffin-Manson analysis, and strain-life methods.
View on AmazonASM Handbook, Volume 19: Fatigue and Fracture
Reference data on thermal fatigue, TMF testing, and creep-fatigue interaction methodology.
View on AmazonFatigue of Structures and Materials by J. Schijve
Authoritative coverage of low-cycle fatigue, variable amplitude loading, and design life prediction.
View on AmazonCreep-Resistant Steels (Woodhead Publishing)
Focused reference on creep-fatigue interaction in high-temperature Cr-Mo and 9-12% Cr power plant steels.
View on AmazonDisclosure: MetallurgyZone participates in the Amazon Associates programme. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support free technical content on this site.