Dezincification and Dealloying Corrosion: Mechanisms and Prevention

Dezincification is the selective removal of zinc from brass, leaving a porous, mechanically compromised copper-rich remnant that can retain its original outward shape while losing most of its strength. This guide develops the layer- and plug-type morphologies, the underlying dissolution mechanisms, and the alloy design and specification practices used to prevent this and related dealloying failures across copper alloy systems.

What Is Dezincification?

Dezincification is a selective (or “de-alloying”) corrosion mechanism in which zinc is preferentially dissolved out of a copper-zinc alloy, leaving behind a weak, porous, copper-enriched remnant that closely approximates the original component geometry. Affected material typically shows a dull red or pink discolouration rather than the normal yellow-gold brass colour, and in advanced cases the component can be broken by hand with a dull, coppery-looking fracture surface despite having the outward appearance of an intact part. This behaviour is a direct extension of the copper alloy metallurgy covered in our brass and bronze alloys guide, and connects to the general corrosion mechanisms discussed in our corrosion mechanisms overview.

Layer-Type vs. Plug-Type Dezincification

Layer-Type Dezincification

Layer-type attack produces a broad, relatively uniform band of dezincified material across the exposed surface, progressively reducing wall thickness. It is most commonly observed in low-zinc (below roughly 15-20 percent Zn) single-phase alpha brasses and tends to progress predictably, which makes it easier to detect through wall-thickness measurement and non-destructive testing before perforation occurs.

Plug-Type Dezincification

Plug-type attack produces localized, deep, roughly cylindrical or conical plugs of dezincified material that penetrate far into the component wall while the surrounding surface remains largely unaffected in both appearance and mechanical properties. It is characteristic of duplex alpha-beta (Muntz metal type) brasses and is considered more hazardous in service because a fitting or valve body can perforate or fail with little visible external warning.

Phase Susceptibility: Why Beta Phase Fails Faster

In duplex brasses, the beta phase carries a higher zinc content and an ordered body-centred-cubic structure that supports faster zinc diffusion and dissolution kinetics than the face-centred-cubic alpha phase. Common inhibitors, arsenic, antimony, and phosphorus, are effective at stabilizing a protective film on the alpha phase but provide little to no protection to the beta phase. As a result, dezincification-resistant duplex brass typically combines inhibitor additions with a post-forming heat treatment, commonly several hours around 500°C followed by slow cooling, that transforms most residual beta phase back to alpha, leaving an essentially single-phase, inhibited microstructure in the finished component. The alpha/beta phase relationship itself follows directly from the copper-zinc phase diagram principles developed in our phase diagram fundamentals article (applied here to the Cu-Zn system rather than Fe-C).

Mechanism: Dissolution-Redeposition vs. Percolation

Two mechanistic models have historically competed to explain dealloying. The dissolution-redeposition mechanism proposes that both alloy constituents initially dissolve, with the more noble element (copper) subsequently redepositing back onto the corroding surface as a porous, sponge-like layer while the less noble element (zinc) remains in solution. The percolation, or volume-diffusion, mechanism proposes instead that only the less noble element dissolves outright, while the more noble atoms left behind rearrange by surface diffusion into a bicontinuous, nanoporous ligament structure without ever fully dissolving. Evidence for brass dezincification in aqueous service environments favours a dissolution-redeposition-dominated pathway, while percolation-based models have found stronger support in some other systems, notably nanoporous gold produced by dealloying gold-silver alloys.

Simplified anodic dissolution step for zinc in brass (dissolution-redeposition view):

Zn (alloy) --> Zn2+ (aq) + 2e-

Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- --> Cu (redeposited, porous)

Net effect: selective zinc loss, porous copper-rich remnant, minimal dimensional change

Electrochemical Driving Force and Environment

Dezincification is fundamentally a galvanic-type process at the microstructural scale, driven by the difference in electrochemical potential between zinc and copper. Its rate and severity are strongly influenced by water chemistry and service conditions, and Pourbaix-diagram reasoning consistent with our corrosion mechanisms guide is useful for evaluating the stability of protective films across the relevant pH and potential range.

Dealloying in Other Alloy Systems

Dezincification is the most commercially significant example of a broader corrosion family called selective leaching or dealloying, in which one constituent of a solid-solution alloy is preferentially removed.

• Denickelification: selective loss of nickel from copper-nickel alloys such as 90-10 and 70-30 CuNi, generally rare but reported in specific aggressive service conditions.
• Dealuminification: selective loss of aluminium from aluminium bronzes, most often associated with the beta phase in duplex aluminium bronze microstructures under marine or acidic conditions.
• Destannification: selective loss of tin from tin bronzes, a less common but documented dealloying mode.
• Graphitic corrosion: selective dissolution of iron from the pearlitic matrix of gray cast iron, leaving a weak, graphite-rich skeleton that retains the original casting shape while losing essentially all mechanical strength; this is functionally the ferrous analogue of dezincification and is covered further in our cast iron microstructure guide.

Testing and Specification

ISO 6509 is the most widely used accelerated test internationally, exposing machined specimens to a cupric chloride solution at approximately 75°C for a defined period and measuring maximum and average dezincification depth against alloy- and application-specific acceptance limits. ASTM B858 provides a comparable dezincification resistance test method used in North America. Dezincification-resistant brass for plumbing, valve, and fitting applications is commonly specified to standards such as ASTM B887 (high-strength DZR brass) or EN 12165 grade CW602N, both of which define composition limits for inhibitor content alongside mechanical property requirements.

Prevention and Mitigation Strategy

• Specify inhibited alpha brass (arsenical, antimonial, or phosphorus-inhibited) for water-contacting components where zinc content exceeds roughly 15 percent.
• For duplex alpha-beta brass, specify DZR-grade material with the appropriate post-forming heat treatment to minimize residual beta phase, rather than relying on inhibitor content alone.
• Where dezincification risk is high and mechanical properties allow, consider substituting a low-zinc brass, a tin bronze, or a copper-nickel alloy with lower inherent susceptibility.
• Control water chemistry where practical: avoid stagnant conditions, manage chloride and sulphate levels, and avoid unnecessary galvanic coupling to more noble metals.
• Specify and verify material against ISO 6509 or ASTM B858 acceptance criteria for critical plumbing, marine, and fire-protection applications.
• Include periodic wall-thickness or hardness verification in inspection programmes for legacy duplex brass components in aggressive service.

Industrial Significance

Dezincification failures in potable water fittings, valves, and fire sprinkler components have historically caused costly leaks, water damage, and safety incidents, driving widespread adoption of DZR brass specifications in plumbing codes across many jurisdictions. The same underlying selective-leaching principle informs failure analysis and material selection decisions across marine hardware, heat exchanger tubing, and cast iron piping systems subject to graphitic corrosion.

Frequently Asked Questions

Recommended Reference Reading

Disclosure: MetallurgyZone participates in the Amazon Associates programme. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support free technical content on this site.

Further Reading